BIZON ZX5000 (AMD + 4 GPU | Water-cooled)With its 4K Ultra HD rendering resolution, Time Spy Extreme is an ideal benchmark test for the latest high-end graphics cards. Starting at 5,499 for the most basic configuration, it’s a major investment. As you’ve probably guessed already, the Mac Pro is the ultimate Apple device for video editing and, probably, any other purpose. Mac Pro best for high-end performance. These are the best Mac for video editing. The best Macs for video editing.BIZON Z5000 (Intel + 4 GPU | Water-cooled)The 15-inch version would be the best MacBook Pro for video editing for those who need to balance portability with decent image and power. Look for tests using an M1. Apple simply listened to its core users and made a better laptop because of it.We tested on a 2017 MacBook Pro with a 3.1GHz Core i5 processor, Intel Iris Plus graphics, and 8GB RAM running macOS Big Suron the low end of power for video editing. For video editing, it is the best laptop that runs macOSif you are a fan. It’s more powerful, has a nicer screen, and steps things up in a few unexpected ways.The base model starts with 8GB of memory, 1TB. Best Macbook For Video Editing 2019The 21.5 iMac 4K Retina Display is another great choice for video editing at a bit more affordable price point. Pros + 5K resolution display Powerful discrete video card. Apple iMac Pro View prices on Amazon.BIZON G9000 (8 A100 SMX4 GPU | Air-cooled) BIZON ZX9000 (AMD + 10 GPU | Water-cooled) BIZON Z9000 (Intel + 10 GPU | Water-cooled) BIZON X7000 (AMD + 10 GPU | Air-cooled) BIZON G7000 (Intel + 10 GPU | Air-cooled)
Best Pro Home Specs For 4K Video Editing Mac Pro IsBIZON ZX5500 (AMD Threadripper PRO, 4 GPU Liquid-Cooled Desktop) BIZON ZX5000 (AMD Threadripper, 4 GPU Liquid-Cooled Desktop) BIZON Z5000 (Intel, 4-7 GPU Liquid-Cooled Desktop) BIZON R1000 (Limited Edition Open-frame Desktop) BIZON ZX9000 (Dual AMD EPYC, 10 GPU Liquid-Cooled Server) BIZON Z9000 (Dual Intel Xeon, 10 GPU Liquid-Cooled Server) Monitor: 27-inch LED-backlit 5K display Additional HDD (Storage): Not available Graphics Card: Radeon Pro Vega 64 with 16GB Processor: 3.0GHz 10-core Intel Xeon W processor While there are many reasons our customers want a change, it usually comes down to one major factor, performance.Whatever you use your Mac or Workstation PC for, performance is important to help you manage your workflow, to ensure your game runs smoothly, for high-quality sound and graphics, and to edit videos efficiently.The rise in 4K, 6K, and 8K workflows makes optimum performance a necessity for many people, so it is essential to make the right choice when considering a computer.With performance being the most important factor when deciding between a PC or a Mac, we take a look at why a PC is a better option to use Adobe’s Premiere Pro video editing application compared to a Mac or iMac Pro 2019.To find out whether a PC or Mac is a best video editing workstation, we took three iMac systems and a PC workstation of a similar price and tested them across performance for live playback, render in to out, and export.If you love data we’re sure you’ll enjoy looking at our charts, which show how the systems compare, but if charts aren’t your thing you can always scroll past the data to read our conclusion.Price $7200 + $169 (Apple Care) = $7369 –> ~7400 Amt emulator not supported on this type of macAs the iMac Pro requires a keyboard and mouse, we also bought a monitor, keyboard, and mouse for the Mac Pro and PC.To compare the systems, we tested three different functions in Premiere Pro: live playback, export, and render in to out.Although we didn’t cover every available codec, we covered a large number of RED clips so that we could really see how different compression levels impact performance. For example, as Mac systems only support a single internal drive, we used a single 1TB PCI-E SSD drive on our BIZON Workstation PC, rather than multiple storage drives, which improve performance when generating peak files and importing media. We also found major performance issues with Premiere Pro CC 2019 (ver 13.1), with performance drops in ProRes footage on the PC and RED footage on the Mac when using versions 13.1 and 13.1.1.For a fair comparison we kept the specs and pricing as similar as possible. Software: Premiere Pro CC 2019 (ver 13.1)We used version 13.1 of Premiere Pro, as the latest version wasn’t released at the time of this article. Warranty: AppleCare+ for iMac (3 yr limited warranty & telephone technical support) Taking 4K, 6K, and 8K projects using the different codecs listed in the Test Hardware & Methodology section we measured export performance on all the systems.With our export tests we found using Metal on a Mac, rather than OpenCL often resulted in a decent performance gain. However, the PC workstation was the clear winner for playback performance and was 25-60% faster depending on the type of footage used making our PC workstation a better option for FPS as well as better value for money.It takes time to export on Premiere Pro and export time is often used to measure performance. However, compared to the iMac-Pro 10-core, our PC workstation gave 25% higher FPS with ProRes media, 30% higher with DNxHR HQ/H.264/ARRIRAW, and almost 75% higher FPS with RED footage, and was 94% faster on average in our ‘Heavy Effects’ test.In comparison, the 14-core iMac Pro did slightly better with RED footage and was about 10% faster than the 10-core iMac Pro. For example, with 4K RED 11:1 footage the iMac Pro 14-core went from 24FPS to 6FPS without any effects being applied to the footage.Even when using OpenCL you will get a bump in FPS with a PC. We also decided to calculate the average performance of each system relative to the 10-core iMac Pro using OpenCL.We found that using Metal with a Mac is a bad idea for playback performance and found a 20-30% drop in FPS with most of our test media, and a massive drop in FPS with RED footage when using Metal on the Mac system. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJay ArchivesCategories |